More Evidence Needed to Support George Ritzers McDonaldization Thesis :: George Ritzer McDonaldization Thesis

much Evidence Needed to Support George Ritzers McDonaldization ThesisThe McDonaldization Thesis presupposes some familiarity with Ritzers front work, The McDonaldization of Society (1993), in which he defines McDonaldization as the process by which the principles of the fast-food run downing place are coming to dominate to a greater extent and more sectors of American confederacy as well as the rest of the existence (1). These principles include efficiency, predictability, calculability (or an accent mark on quantification), and control (especially via non-human technologies). Taken together, they constitute the formal ( practicable or instrumental) reason that undergirds McDonaldization. In the present work, Ritzer continues to sound the alarm by depicting McDonaldization as a largely one-way process in which a serial of American innovations are being aggressively exported to much of the rest of the world (8).Although the author acknowledges that the McDonaldization thesis is rooted in Webers reflections on rationality, specifically the imagination of the iron cage of rationality, he prefers the simplicity of Mannheims esteeming on the subject. The latter, for example, locates the organic irrationality of highly rationalized systems, such as McDonaldized ones, in threats to the ability to think whereas, the former emphasizes threats to human values, an area the author deems unnecessarily messy for the purposes of his theory-based analysis. The author further justifies this position by noning the cognitive demands of the present post-industrial system in which human beings live. Indeed, it is the dehumanization resulting from the simultaneous increase in functional rationality and decrease in substantive rationality, which rationalized systems demand and perpetuate, that animates the author.The author introduces the conception of the new means of consumption to illustrate the ways in which not only business, but cultural, practices are threate ned by McDonaldization. Defined as those things owned by capitalists and rendered by them as necessary to customers in indian lodge for them to consume (91), examples of the new means of consumption include fast-food restaurants, credit cards, mega-malls, kinsperson shopping television networks, and cybermalls. The critical point for the author is that each changes the ways individuals consume. For example, the exportation of fast-food restaurants and American eating habits, with their emphasis on food as something to be consumed as quickly, efficiently, and inexpensively as possible, alters the way people eat and, thereby, poses a profound threat to the entire cultural complex of some(prenominal) societies (8). There is a distinct normative dimension to the concept of the new means of consumption, which is evident in the authors insistence that they constrain individuals to buy more than they need and to spend more than they should (119).