Essay on Barack Obama Leadership

experiment on Barack Obama pass byersChoose an example of a successful loss leader from the public/political or private sphere and explain why s/he is a good example of leadership personified. stand-in your claim and bolster your argument with the theories and concepts in the text and lectures. Be sure as shooting to use facts, statistics, figures, and academic or scholarly articles to support your claimsINTRODUCTIONLeadership is the art of motivating or inspiring a group of bulk to act towards achieving a common goal. A leaderstepsupintimesofcrisis, and is capable to think andactcreatively in difficult situations. on that point ar numerous leaders out on that point who have been successful in leading a group of people, an make-up or the general public. Functions of a leader includes Engaging pursuit, integrating them, supply to their needs, aspirations, and goals in a common organization while making them give citizens, pursuit and leaders. (Simmons, 2008). A good exa mple that fits this category of leadership is Barack Obama. Barack Obama was catapulted into field of study prominence, in part, because of his skill at building bonds of empathy with supporters from a seemingly impossibly broad political base (Noble , 2009). Conservatives marve conduct at his use of language and metaphors that resonated with their incumbrance beliefs, while Liberals and progressives believed that the rise to prominence of a self-identified African the Statesn with spic civil rights credentials represented a triumph for their own incumbrance agenda (Noble , 2009). This paper will focus on the leadership of Barack Obama how he made history and was able to lead the country during the time of crisis. Furthermore, the conjectural standpoints of postmodernistism and transformational leadership will be implemented to talk over some of the reasons he was successful as a leader.BIOGRAPHYBarack Obama was born in 1961 to a father from Kenya and a m different from Kansas. He was raised with the service of process of his grandfather, who served in Pattons army, and his grandmother, who worked her way up from the secretarial pool to middle management at a bank (Luce 2008). After working his way through college with the dish of scholarships and student loans, he moved to Chicago, where he worked with a group of churches to help rebuild communities devastated by the closure of local steel plants. After that, he went on to attend law school, where he became the number 1 African-American hot seat of theHarvard Law Review (Luce, 2008). After graduation, he returned to Chicago to help lead a voter registration drive, teach constitutional law at the University of Chicago, and remain active in his company. Barack Obamas years of public service are based around his unwavering belief in the ability to immix people around a politics of purpose. In the Illinois State Senate, he passed the depression major ethics reform in 25 years, bring down taxes for w orking families, and expanded health care for children and their parents (Luce, 2008). As a united States Senator, he reached across the aisle to pass ground-breaking lobbying reform, lock up the worlds intimately dangerous weapons, and bring transparency to government by putting subject spending online (Luce, 2008).HISTORIC ELECTIONNovember 4, 2008 was an past day for Americans, as they nonable the election of Barack Obama as the 44th President.The election was the longest presidential apparent movement and the almost expensive in history (Green Roberts, 2012). Moreover, the historic event label the premier time that two US senators ran against each other. New York Senator Hilary Clinton was the first serious female presidential panorama, while Senator Barak Obamawas the first African American nominated by a major party for president. For the Republican Party, genus Arizona Senator John McCain had hoped to become the oldest person elected president to a first term in A merica. His running mate Alaska Governor Sarah Palin was the first charwoman vice president candidate for the Republican Party (Green Roberts, 2012). The whole presidential race was full of historic moments and it was an election like no other. During the historical presidential race, the media and other experts would often discuss whether a multiracial candidate could win. Some observers argued that Obama may non win because of his racial background. Conversely, other observers viewed him as a post-racial candidate (Green Roberts, 2012). Other opp adeptnts mentioned that Obama was too inexperienced, untested, and unready to become the president. Nevertheless, his political savvy, mod election strategy, and charismatic personality was enough to make him victorious. The former Senator has managed to jeer astonishing numbers of people from different races (Black, White, Latino, Asian etc.) with his wisdom, optimism, wit, and exuberance. In one of his speech that took place on 2 7 July 2004 at the Democratic field Convention in Boston he spoke of his belief that, Theres not a liberal America and a conservative America, theres the United States of America. Theres not a Black America and White America and Latino America and Asian America theres the United States of America. (Noble , 2009).TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIPAfter the end of George furnishs presidential reign, the American people had grown tired of the same political atmosphere. Voters treasured something new that could bring diverseness to the country. Transformational leadership places intrinsic motivation on their pursual, thereby creating a massive appeal to supporters (Green Roberts, 2012). Bass and Riggio (2005) suggested that transformational leadership serve well followers to grow and develop into leaders by responding to individual followers needs, by empowering them, and aligning the goals of the individual followers. Transformational leaders possess the personal characteristics of oth er effective leaders, especially charismatic leaders (Dubrin, 2013). Transformational leaders who possess a clear and compelling vision can impose their views of reality on followers violating the foundational principle of individual and collective knowledge creation indecorum characteristic of the postmodern quantify system (Green Roberts, 2012). During the 2008 presidential election, there was a strong desire by many citizens for change in leadership. There were a number of things that needed to be fixed such as, the imploded caparison market and the collapse of the economy. The bush authorities achieved one of the lowest eulogy ratings in history (Green Roberts, 2012). During the presidential election, there was a cry for change. little voters precious a leader who inspires and possesses a clear vision. This was exactly what Barack Obama did as a leader. He captured the young voters attention and gave the American people the change theyve been longing for. He is a good exa mple of a transformational leader. wind DURING CRISISBarack Obama got sworn into office during the time of an economic crisis. The country was undergoing a receding but nonetheless, he came into office ready to take action. One of his first priorities after getting into office was to tackle the financial crisis. His stimulus software and some of the carryover from the Bush administration pushed money into the economy when it was needed the most. His car bailout gave manufacturing a lifeline (GM, Chrysler, Ford), and his support for credit starved banks, slowed down the open of subprime contagion (Barmak, Beer, Brearto, Castaldo, Cowan, 2012). Even though some believe he did not make the economic life better in his first quartet years in office, he certainly prevented it from getting much worse. And on re-election day, voters rewarded him for that. According to exit polls, more than half of voters still blamed George W. Bush for the sluggish economy. Only 38% blamed the preside nt (Barack Obama). Surprisingly, quaternity in ten people told pollsters they believed the economy was getting better. Among that cohort, 88% sided with Obama (Barmak, Beer, Brearto, Castaldo, Cowan, 2012). In the run low full quarter before the second election, real GDP in the U.S. grew at a slow rate of 1.3% and Joblessness remained very high. No session president had ever won re-election with unemployment above 7.4% in the months leading up to a vote (Barmak, Beer, Brearto, Castaldo, Cowan, 2012), but Barack Obama was able to pull it off. During his second and most recent presidential campaign, Obamaargued that the only solution to Americas deficit problem was a mixture of increased revenues and lowered spending. In contrast, Mitt Romney consistently kept up(p) that he could eliminate the deficit without raising taxes. He even promised to weakened them below their current rates. Mitt Romneys plan was not realistic and his political agendas were rather inconsistent. Obamas plan was a far more realistic approach. By promising to increase marginal rates on the very wealthy-essentially by allowing some Bush tax cuts to expire-Obama offered a path that, while not perfect, at least heads in the direction of future deficit decline (Barmak, Beer, Brearto, Castaldo, Cowan, 2012).POSTMODERNISMAccording to research, younger extension in the United States and throughout the essential world now possess a more postmodern and post-materialist value system. For the first time in American history, there are four generations co-existing in the workplace. Which are, the Greatest Generation (1922-1945), the Baby Boomer (1946-1964), Generation X (1965-1980), and Millennial (1981-2000) groups (Green Roberts, 2012). It became clear that Obamas campaign communication methods and message appealed to the Millennias sense of community involvement. Barack Obama used the opportunity to connect with his generation and the younger voters population. The Bush administration wa s not able to meet the new set of values and expectations that the millennial generation is driven by. Some core postmodern traits include repugn authority, attacking conventional wisdom, tolerating ambiguity, accepting diversity, and building constructive reality (Green Roberts, 2012). Consequently, postmodernists befall themselves distrustful of institutions and hard facts. Baby Boomers leadership style is characterized by an lordly mentality while Millennial are governed by a pop approach (Green Roberts, 2012). These divergent generational leadership traits inspire some followers while inhibiting others. It is important for a leader (Presidential Candidate) to understand the cultural differences of this postmodern generation in order to win them over as followers/supporters. For example, Barack Obamas inclusiveness regarding the issue of religion was consistent with postmodern assumptions that reject mutually scoop shovel truth claims (Green Roberts, 2012). He was also able to connect with the younger generation through the internet (e.g. twitter) and was successful in getting more than the universal amount of youths to go out and vote for him. Therefore, one may break up that Obamas understanding of post-modernism and all the cultural differences of the new generation made a big difference for his campaign and contributed to his success as a historic leader.CONCLUSIONTo summarize in short, Barack Obamas knowledge of postmodernism and his appeal to the different cultural groups across America (Blacks, Latino, Whites and other races) are some of what contributed to his success as a leader. He is a good example of a transformational leader. Barack Obama was catapulted into national prominence, in part, because of his skill at building bonds of empathy with supporters from a seemingly impossibly broad political base. His charisma, honesty and wit made him a queer leader. He believed in the slogan of Change which was what the American people wanted after the Bush administration left office. He was also able to connect with the younger generation through his savvy communication methods and through the internet which got more than the usual amount of the younger generation to go out and vote. This paper analysed the leadership of Barack Obama how he made history and led the country during the time of crisis. It also incorporated the theoretical standpoints of postmodernism and transformational leadership to discuss some of the reasons why he was successful as a leader. His leadership during the time of crisis was also touched upon with some credible statistical info to back it up.