The Limits of Science Essay -- Philosophy Papers

Does erudition have both limits? Scientists allege no. Philosophers argon divided in their response. The humanities say that science is not humanitarian, and thus not metaphysically deep. In response, scientists and round philosophers contend that science is the best knowledge we have about the world. I argue that science is limited by its form. Science has no object lens that derives from the human form. Everything that is incomparable to the dimension of the human body is reducible to notions that are commensurable to that body. This phenomenologically clarifies some of the most important discoveries in contemporary science. The particular Theory of Relativity shows the dependence of space and time on the be system. Quantum mechanics displays the limits of observation (Heisenberg) and logical indefiniteness by compelling the initiation of a macropresentation of micro-objects and gets around logic (Feyerabend) through the principle of additionality. Experimental science has come out as an artificial projection of human expansion, not as a reflection of the transcendent order of the world itself. The career world successfully takes the place of the objective world of modern rationality. Does experimental Science have either limits? This question is not so provoke for the contemporary philosophy of Science. no like the questions of reality, objectivity, rationality. I believe, that these questions could be elucidated by answering the question of limitness, or, of form of Science.Does Empirical Science have any limits? The answer of the scientists is No Science is unlimited. There are no scientifically unresolvable questions, they have sense. The answer of the philosophers is not clear, but it is close to No. It is shown not only i... ...rld.And now, at the issue of this study, occurs a question Does the pre-scientific covetous of the world through logic, space and time really need the advantage which the experimental science proposes?Notes(1) Ghe rdjikov, S. Limits of Science. Sofia, Extreme Press, 1995.(2) distinguish Heelan, P. Space-perception and the Philosophy of Science. Berkeley-Los Angeles-London, University of California Press, 1983.(3) See McTagart, J. The Nature of Existence. Northampton, J. Dickens & Co., 1968. Paragraphs 303-351.(4) Hempel, K., Oppenheim, P. Studies in the Logic of Explanation. N. Y., 1970. (5) Gerdjikov, S. A Matrix baby-sit of Scientific Explanation.-International Congress Logic and Methodology of Science. Proceedings. Moscow, 1987. Vol. 6, p. 367- 368. (6) Popper, K. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Hutchinson of London. London, 1959.